UPDATED: 03-20-26 14:37 PDT

stick Rutgers
  
Rutgers               
W-L: ( 5- 4) PR = 89.6548

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 206 H Army Patriot ( 6- 2, 89.5) 14-19 213 A Delaware Atlantic Sun ( 3- 4, 87.1) 12- 4 218 H Monmouth (NJ) Colonial ( 6- 3, 79.3) 20- 5 221 A Villanova Big East ( 5- 3, 86.2) 15-12 225 A Princeton Ivy League ( 3- 3, 91.9) 9-15 228 H Hofstra Colonial ( 5- 4, 82.9) 17- 7 307 A Temple AAC ( 8- 2, 85.2) 17-16 311 A Stony Brook Colonial ( 7- 2, 93.0) 8-11 315 H Johns Hopkins Big Ten ( 8- 1, 91.4) 12-15 319 A Ohio State Big Ten ( 6- 2, 90.5) 328 A Southern California Big Ten ( 6- 4, 85.1) 330 A San Diego State Big 12 ( 1- 6, 78.4) 404 A Maryland Big Ten ( 8- 0, 93.4) 409 H Michigan Big Ten ( 6- 2, 91.7) 412 A Northwestern Big Ten ( 5- 3, 94.2) 412 H Oregon Big Ten ( 6- 3, 81.7) 418 H Penn State Big Ten ( 9- 1, 92.8)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   206 H Army                   14-19      -5     1    ---   -6.50
   213 A Delaware               12- 4       8     1    +++    6.81
   218 H Monmouth (NJ)          20- 5      15    12    +      2.35
   221 A Villanova              15-12       3     2           0.91
   225 A Princeton               9-15      -6    -4    -     -2.44
   228 H Hofstra                17- 7      10     8           1.95
   307 A Temple                 17-16       1     3    -     -2.13
   311 A Stony Brook             8-11      -3    -5           1.66
   315 H Johns Hopkins          12-15      -3     0    -     -2.61

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   206 H Army                   14-19      -5     1    ---   -6.50
   225 A Princeton               9-15      -6    -4    -     -2.44
   307 A Temple                 17-16       1     3    -     -2.13
   315 H Johns Hopkins          12-15      -3     0    -     -2.61

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   213 A Delaware               12- 4       8     1    +++    6.81
   218 H Monmouth (NJ)          20- 5      15    12    +      2.35

Rutgers Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Akron Rutgers   Rutgers
Albany Rutgers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rutgers
American Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Arizona State Rutgers   Rutgers
Army Army Army  
Austin Peay Rutgers   Rutgers
Binghamton Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Boston College Boston College   Boston College
Boston University Rutgers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rutgers
Brown Rutgers   Rutgers
Bryant Rutgers   Rutgers
Bucknell Rutgers   Rutgers
Butler Rutgers   Rutgers
California Rutgers   Rutgers
Campbell Rutgers   Rutgers
Canisius Rutgers   Rutgers
Central Connecticut Rutgers   Rutgers
Central Michigan Rutgers   Rutgers
Cincinnati Rutgers   Rutgers
Clemson Clemson   Clemson
Coastal Carolina Rutgers   Rutgers
Colgate Rutgers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rutgers
Colorado Colorado insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Colorado
Columbia Rutgers   Rutgers
Connecticut Rutgers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rutgers
Cornell Cornell   Cornell
Dartmouth Rutgers   Rutgers
Davidson Rutgers   Rutgers
Delaware Rutgers Rutgers  
Delaware State Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Denver Denver tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Denver
Detroit Mercy Rutgers   Rutgers
Drexel Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Duke Duke tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Duke
Duquesne Rutgers   Rutgers
East Carolina Rutgers   Rutgers
Eastern Michigan Rutgers   Rutgers
Elon Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Fairfield Rutgers tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Rutgers
Fairleigh Dickinson Rutgers   Rutgers
Florida Florida   Florida
Florida State Rutgers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rutgers
Furman Rutgers   Rutgers
Gardner Webb Rutgers   Rutgers
George Mason Rutgers   Rutgers
George Washington Rutgers   Rutgers
Georgetown Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Rutgers
Harvard Rutgers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rutgers
High Point Rutgers   Rutgers
Hofstra Rutgers Rutgers  
Holy Cross Rutgers   Rutgers
Howard (DC) Rutgers   Rutgers
Iona Rutgers   Rutgers
Jacksonville Rutgers   Rutgers
James Madison Rutgers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rutgers
Johns Hopkins Johns Hopkins Johns Hopkins  
Kennesaw State Rutgers   Rutgers
Kent State Rutgers   Rutgers
La Salle Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Lafayette Rutgers tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Rutgers
Le Moyne Rutgers   Rutgers
Lehigh Rutgers   Rutgers
Liberty Rutgers tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Rutgers
Lindenwood Rutgers   Rutgers
LIU Rutgers   Rutgers
Longwood Rutgers   Rutgers
Louisville Rutgers   Rutgers
Loyola (MD) Rutgers insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) Rutgers
Manhattan Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Marist Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Rutgers
Marquette Rutgers   Rutgers
Maryland Maryland insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Maryland
Massachusetts Rutgers   Rutgers
Massachusetts-Lowell Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Mercer Rutgers   Rutgers
Mercyhurst Rutgers   Rutgers
Merrimack Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Michigan Michigan   Michigan
Monmouth (NJ) Rutgers Rutgers  
Mount St Marys Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Navy Navy tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Navy
New Hampshire Rutgers   Rutgers
New Haven Rutgers   Rutgers
Niagara Rutgers   Rutgers
North Carolina North Carolina   North Carolina
Northwestern Northwestern Northwestern   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Notre Dame Notre Dame   Notre Dame
Ohio State Ohio State   Ohio State
Old Dominion Rutgers   Rutgers
Oregon Rutgers   Rutgers
Penn Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Rutgers
Penn State Penn State tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Penn State
Pittsburgh Rutgers   Rutgers
Presbyterian Rutgers   Rutgers
Princeton Princeton Princeton  
Queens Rutgers   Rutgers
Quinnipiac Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Radford Rutgers   Rutgers
Rhode Island Rutgers   Rutgers
Richmond Rutgers   Rutgers
Rider Rutgers Rutgers   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Robert Morris Rutgers   Rutgers
Sacred Heart Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
San Diego State Rutgers   Rutgers
Siena Rutgers insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Rutgers
South Florida Rutgers tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Rutgers
Southern California Rutgers   Rutgers
St Bonaventure Rutgers   Rutgers
St Josephs (PA) Rutgers Rutgers   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Stanford Stanford   Stanford
Stetson Rutgers   Rutgers
Stonehill Rutgers   Rutgers
Stony Brook Stony Brook Stony Brook  
Syracuse Syracuse   Syracuse
Temple Rutgers Rutgers  
Towson Rutgers Rutgers   2- 0 vs 0- 2
UC Davis Rutgers   Rutgers
UMBC Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
UNC-Charlotte Rutgers   Rutgers
Vanderbilt Rutgers   Rutgers
VCU Rutgers   Rutgers
Vermont Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers
Villanova Rutgers Rutgers  
Virginia Virginia insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Virginia
Virginia Tech Rutgers   Rutgers
Wagner Rutgers Rutgers   2- 0 vs 0- 2
William & Mary Rutgers   Rutgers
Winthrop Rutgers   Rutgers
Wofford Rutgers   Rutgers
Xavier Rutgers   Rutgers
Yale Yale   Yale
Youngstown State Rutgers insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Rutgers

PowerWise = 109


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.26

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Army            ( 6- 2, 89.5)    14-19      -10.41      29.37      -1.33         0.92            -5.39
   0 A Delaware        ( 3- 4, 87.1)    12- 4      -12.77      27.01       1.33         0.92            52.00
   0 H Monmouth (NJ)   ( 6- 3, 79.3)    20- 5      -20.57      19.22      -1.33         0.92            32.82
   0 A Villanova       ( 5- 3, 86.2)    15-12      -13.67      26.12       1.33         0.92            50.35
   0 A Princeton       ( 3- 3, 91.9)     9-15       -8.01      31.77       1.33         0.92            -3.06
   0 H Hofstra         ( 5- 4, 82.9)    17- 7      -16.96      22.82      -1.33         0.92            39.42
   0 A Temple          ( 8- 2, 85.2)    17-16      -14.71      25.07       1.33         0.92            48.44
   0 A Stony Brook     ( 7- 2, 93.0)     8-11       -6.91      32.87       1.33         0.92            -2.56
   0 H Johns Hopkins   ( 8- 1, 91.4)    12-15       -8.52      31.26      -1.33         0.92            -4.52
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       207.51

winning pts = 223.0352 losing points = -15.5302

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------